[ad_1]
We all know from expertise that when Labour politicians begin speaking a couple of ‘New Deal’ it is time to depend the spoons.
With Tony Blair, it presaged a £5.6billion-a-year tax raid on final-salary pensions from which the business by no means recovered.
The end result has been that nearly the one defined-benefit pension schemes left are these within the public sector, that are immediately funded by the taxpayer.
Angela Rayner‘s New Deal, outlined on the TUC annual congress yesterday, shouldn’t be such a direct assault on non-public financial savings, however might in the end show simply as pricey.
To cheers from the comrades, the occasion’s deputy chief promised {that a} Labour authorities would carry ahead an employment rights invoice in its first 100 days.
Placing, mentioned Angela Rayner, is ‘a elementary freedom that must be revered’. She would possibly strive telling that to passengers who’ve given up travelling by prepare due to fixed walkouts
Extra energy to unions, extra collective bargaining, an finish to zero-hours contracts. Plus, inevitably, the scrapping of legal guidelines requiring minimal ranges of service to be maintained throughout strikes in key industries such because the railways.
Perish the thought that unions ought to have to point out any sense of duty to those that pay their wages.
Placing, mentioned Ms Rayner, is ‘a elementary freedom that must be revered’. She would possibly strive telling that to passengers who’ve given up travelling by prepare due to fixed walkouts.
Or the tons of of 1000’s of sufferers left in ache and discomfort as their operations had been cancelled due to strike motion first by nurses after which by docs.
What worth their elementary freedoms?
We discovered within the Nineteen Seventies what occurs when the mix of a socialist authorities and over-mighty unions take management of British business.
Productiveness crashes, revenue turns into a unclean phrase, progress and finally enterprise viability are crushed.
By 1979, Britain was universally thought to be the sick man of Europe. It took the braveness of Margaret Thatcher to face as much as the union militants and administer the required financial drugs.
Considerably, New Labour didn’t repeal any of the union legal guidelines that she introduced in when the occasion got here to energy – together with the laws that outlawed secondary picketing.
However this isn’t New Labour. Regardless of Sir Keir Starmer’s makes an attempt to shift to the centre floor, it stays the occasion of Jeremy Corbyn, for whom Miss Rayner was one of many essential cheerleaders.
This New Deal for employees is straight out of his hard-Left playbook.
Keir’s migrant muddle
Labour has additionally revealed its large concept for stopping unlawful migrants crossing the Channel in small boats – give the Nationwide Crime Company extra money to arrange a unit devoted to smashing trafficking gangs.
Nevertheless, such a unit already exists. And whereas it’s doing its greatest to stem the circulate of migrants, the NCA admits regulation enforcement alone won’t ever remedy the issue.
The one option to break the enterprise mannequin, it says, is to clarify that unlawful entrants shall be eliminated, reasonably than allowed to remain in Britain.
As ever, Sir Keir Starmer is fast to trash Authorities coverage, however relating to options he has nothing to supply however posturing and empty phrases
That is the entire level of the Rwanda scheme. So why does Labour oppose it so implacably?
As ever, Sir Keir Starmer is fast to trash Authorities coverage, however relating to options he has nothing to supply however posturing and empty phrases.
The Prime Minister says he ‘is not going to settle for’ Chinese language interference within the UK’s democracy.
Superb phrases, however given the most recent spy scandal, on high of different examples of Chinese language brokers infiltrating the corridors of British energy, that horse might have already got bolted.
Relatively than gagging MPs who wish to know extra concerning the scale of the issue, is not it time this complete topic was thrown into open debate? Bland assurances are merely not sufficient.
[ad_2]
Source
